[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <541D867C.6080407@roeck-us.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 06:51:56 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>, wim@...ana.be
CC: linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] watchdog: dw_wdt: restart the counter immediately
after enabling WDT
On 09/18/2014 11:29 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> The TOP_INIT may be zero, so the timeout period may be very short after
> initialization is done, thus the system may be reset soon after enabling.
> We fix this problem by restarting the counter immediately after enabling
> WDT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
> index 9f21029..ad0619d 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
> @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ static int dw_wdt_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> dw_wdt_set_top(DW_WDT_MAX_TOP);
> writel(WDOG_CONTROL_REG_WDT_EN_MASK,
> dw_wdt.regs + WDOG_CONTROL_REG_OFFSET);
> + dw_wdt_keepalive();
> }
>
> dw_wdt_set_next_heartbeat();
>
After getting access to the datasheet, I concluded that this fix is wrong
or at least more risky than necessary. The datasheet states that top_init,
ie bit 4-7 of the wdt_torr register, needs to be initialized with the desired
timeout period prior to enabling the watchdog. dw_wdt_set_top() sets it to
0 instead, ie to the lowest possible timeout period.
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists