linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.17-rc5] Fix confusing PFA_NO_NEW

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLf3st2WBV5ycEOgCJGk8z5TP1SuvLQcD=sC2cs_4CF8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 20 Sep 2014 10:19:56 -0700
From:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	David Drysdale <drysdale@...gle.com>,
	Michael Kerrisk-manpages <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
	Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
	Julien Tinnes <jln@...omium.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Linux MIPS Mailing List <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.17-rc5] Fix confusing PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS constant.

On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:40 AM, Tetsuo Handa
<penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
> Can you apply below patch before new PFA_* are defined?
> Cgroups code might want to define PFA_SPREAD_PAGE as 1 and PFA_SPREAD_SLAB as 2.
> ----------------------------------------
> >From 8543e68adb210142fa347d8bc9d83df0bb2c5291 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 19:24:23 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH 3.17-rc5] Fix confusing PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS constant.
>
> Commit 1d4457f99928 ("sched: move no_new_privs into new atomic flags")
> defined PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS as hexadecimal value, but it is confusing
> because it is used as bit number. Redefine it as decimal bit number.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> ---
>  include/linux/sched.h |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 5c2c885..4557765 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1957,7 +1957,7 @@ static inline void memalloc_noio_restore(unsigned int flags)
>  }
>
>  /* Per-process atomic flags. */
> -#define PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS 0x00000001    /* May not gain new privileges. */
> +#define PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS 0     /* May not gain new privileges. */
>
>  static inline bool task_no_new_privs(struct task_struct *p)
>  {

Thanks, good catch.

Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/