lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMAQheOpXxa-ndT1EuOqJgae3yzEWbRTLMs+y800S930w-xKsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 19 Sep 2014 19:44:51 -0600
From:	Eduardo Silva <edsiper@...il.com>
To:	Tobias Oberstein <tobias.oberstein@...il.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: SO_REUSEPORT and Unix domain sockets

>
> How can this be used for sockets of type AF_UNIX?
>
> I can only get it working with TCP sockets, not Unix domain sockets.
>
> When using TCP, the incoming clients will get nicely balanced to all
> processes listening. With Unix domain sockets, the incoming clients all get
> connected only to the last started process.
>
> The test code (Python) I was trying is here:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/23742368/can-so-reuseport-be-used-on-unix-domain-sockets
>
> Any hints appreciated,
> /Tobias


Looking at the original patch looks like the implementation is only
done for TCP and UDP:

     http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c617f398edd4db2b8567a28e899a88f8f574798d

UNIX domain sockets use the file system as the address name space, so
SO_REUSEPORT would not be applicable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ