lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 21 Sep 2014 12:49:33 -0700
From:	Arjan van de Ven <>
To:	Mathias Krause <>,
	Thomas Gleixner <>,
	Ingo Molnar <>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/3] x86, ptdump: Simplify page flag evaluation code

On 9/21/2014 8:26 AM, Mathias Krause wrote:
> -		if (pr & _PAGE_PCD)
> -			pt_dump_cont_printf(m, dmsg, "PCD ");
> -		else
> -			pt_dump_cont_printf(m, dmsg, "    ");
> +		pt_dump_cont(m, dmsg, "%-4s", pr & _PAGE_USER ? "USR" : "");

while you have some nice cleanups in your patch, I can't say I consider this an improvement.
Yes the C standard allows ? to be used like this
but no, I don't think it improves readability in general.
(I think for me the main exception is NULL pointer cases, but this is not one of these)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists