[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <541F2BCD.2040007@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 12:49:33 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/3] x86, ptdump: Simplify page flag evaluation code
On 9/21/2014 8:26 AM, Mathias Krause wrote:
> - if (pr & _PAGE_PCD)
> - pt_dump_cont_printf(m, dmsg, "PCD ");
> - else
> - pt_dump_cont_printf(m, dmsg, " ");
> + pt_dump_cont(m, dmsg, "%-4s", pr & _PAGE_USER ? "USR" : "");
while you have some nice cleanups in your patch, I can't say I consider this an improvement.
Yes the C standard allows ? to be used like this
but no, I don't think it improves readability in general.
(I think for me the main exception is NULL pointer cases, but this is not one of these)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists