[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140921231010.GN7362@norris-Latitude-E6410>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 16:10:10 -0700
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bus: brcmstb_gisb: register the fault code hook
Hi Thomas,
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 03:19:50PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 12:44:39 -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
> > -void __init brcmstb_hook_fault_code(void)
> > +static int __init brcmstb_hook_fault_code(void)
> > {
> > hook_fault_code(22, brcmstb_bus_error_handler, SIGBUS, 0,
> > "imprecise external abort");
> > + return 0;
> > }
> > +arch_initcall(brcmstb_hook_fault_code)
>
> I don't have the entire context, but if your platform is part of
> multi-platform, it means that regardless of which platform is actually
> booting your system, you will register your fault hook. Is this the
> intended behavior?
>
> Generally speaking, in a multiplatform context, many arch_initcall()
> should have a conditional to check whether we're really on a platform
> where the initcall is needed.
Florian already sent v2, about which I already made a similar comment:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/19/516
I believe Florian plans to move this into the platform device probe
function instead.
Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists