lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 21 Sep 2014 16:10:10 -0700
From:	Brian Norris <>
To:	Thomas Petazzoni <>
Cc:	Florian Fainelli <>,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bus: brcmstb_gisb: register the fault code hook

Hi Thomas,

On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 03:19:50PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 12:44:39 -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > -void __init brcmstb_hook_fault_code(void)
> > +static int __init brcmstb_hook_fault_code(void)
> >  {
> >  	hook_fault_code(22, brcmstb_bus_error_handler, SIGBUS, 0,
> >  			"imprecise external abort");
> > +	return 0;
> >  }
> > +arch_initcall(brcmstb_hook_fault_code)
> I don't have the entire context, but if your platform is part of
> multi-platform, it means that regardless of which platform is actually
> booting your system, you will register your fault hook. Is this the
> intended behavior?
> Generally speaking, in a multiplatform context, many arch_initcall()
> should have a conditional to check whether we're really on a platform
> where the initcall is needed.

Florian already sent v2, about which I already made a similar comment:

I believe Florian plans to move this into the platform device probe
function instead.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists