lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 22 Sep 2014 01:19:46 +0200
From:	Tomasz Figa <>
To:	Alim Akhtar <>
CC:	Alim Akhtar <>,,
	Rob Herring <>,
	"" <>,
	Thomas P Abraham <>,
	Marek Szyprowski <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty/serial: samsung: Add earlycon support

On 22.09.2014 01:10, Alim Akhtar wrote:


>>> As you said there is no support for ioremap on ARM, so this is not
>>> tested on ARM.
>> Don't forget that this driver is primarily targeted for ARM platforms
>> (versus just one ARM64-based Exynos7), so either this feature should be
>> clearly added as ARM64-specific (and compiled in conditionally) or made
>> work for all supported platforms.
> Well, this will work on every platform which uses
> "samsung,exynos4210-uart" as a UART controller.
> Exynos7 also use same, there is nothing special about ARM64 bit here.
> please see[1].
> For "s3c24xx-uart", this has to be implemented separably as that is a
> bit different.

For this feature, they differ only in locations and lengths of
FIFO-related bit fields. We had this already implemented for all
hardware variants and so my recommendation to reuse that code.

>>>>>               smh     Use ARM semihosting calls for early console.
>>>>>       earlyprintk=    [X86,SH,BLACKFIN,ARM,M68k]


> Tomasz/Marek,
> Do you think something like below make sense here?
> +static void exynos4210_serial_console_putc(struct uart_port *port, int ch)
> +{
> +       while (!(readl(port->membase + S3C2410_UFCON) & S3C2410_UFCON_FIFOMODE))
> +               ;

Waiting in a loop for a software-writable FIFO mode enable bit doesn't
look reasonable to me. Probably a typo?

> +
> +       wr_regb(port, S3C2410_UTXH, ch);
> +
> +       while ((readl(port->membase + S3C2410_UFSTAT) & S5PV210_UFSTAT_TXFULL))
> +               ;

I wonder if you need to wait for the character to be sent. If you ensure
before writing a character that there is no previous one in the buffer
or there is space in FIFO then I believe you should be fine.

> +}
> and call exynos4210_serial_console_putc() in samsung_early_write()?
> Anyway functions names need to be changes accordingly.

Yes, this is exactly what we had implemented in the patch I mentioned,
except that the putc function was generic for all hardware variants.

Best regards,
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists