[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <541E99FF.9050607@plexistor.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 12:27:27 +0300
From: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
CC: Boaz Harrosh <openosd@...il.com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-nvdimm] [PATCH v2] pmem: Initial version of persistent
memory driver
On 09/19/2014 07:27 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> before adding any new device
> discovery capabilities to pmem.
>
I lost you? what "new device discovery capabilities" do you see in
Ross's or my code to pmem?
Actually my point is that I hope there will never be any. That the discovery
should be elsewhere in an ARCH/driver LLD and pmem stays generic.
I feel we are not disagreeing, just not communicating. Please explain again,
sorry for not understanding. What in the code I sent, you do not like? What
in the code is dependent on UEFI organization's paper. That might need to
change?
Again sorry for being slow. please explain again?
Thanks
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists