linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: new topology for multi-NUMA-node CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140922074315.GE5366@x2.net.home>
Date:	Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:43:15 +0200
From:	Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...ux.intel.com,
	brice.goglin@...il.com, bp@...en8.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: new topology for multi-NUMA-node CPUs

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:15:05AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 09/19/2014 04:45 AM, Karel Zak wrote:
> >  hmm... it would be also nice to test it with lscpu(1) from 
> >  util-linux (but it uses maps rather than lists from cpu*/topology/).
> 
> Here's the output with and with out Cluster-on-Die enabled.
> 
> Everything looks OK to me.  The cache size changes are what the CPU
> actually tells us through CPUID leaves.

 Thanks Dave!

    Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@...hat.com>
 http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/