linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] power: twl4030-madc-battery: Convert to iio consumer.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140922105236.GH3290@leverpostej>
Date:	Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:52:36 +0100
From:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:	Belisko Marek <marek.belisko@...il.com>
Cc:	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@....com>,
	"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	"Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] power: twl4030-madc-battery: Convert to iio consumer.

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 09:13:47PM +0100, Belisko Marek wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
> 
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Hi Marek,
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 09:52:52PM +0200, Belisko Marek wrote:
> >> can you please take this series (I'll post update version with
> >> removing debug code). Thanks.
> >
> > mh. I will not pull this with "(dis)charging-calibration-data" as
> > DT property name without an ACK from the DT binding maintainers.
> DT maintainers ping.

Apologies for the delay. I will take a look at the bidning shortly.

> >
> > I would feel fine with pulling this when they are prefixed with
> > "ti,". Otherwise the series looks good to me.
> Why it should be prefixed by "ti"? Isn't enough to have "ti" prefix for driver
> compatible property? Thanks.

Because if we want to add a similar generic property, the names will
clash.

Ideally bindings should use prefixed properties by default -- those can
be replaced with generic properties as commonality becomes apparent.

Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/