lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 12:05:22 +0100 From: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com> To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>, linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@....com>, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>, Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>, Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>, Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>, linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Device Tree ML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 07/10] OF: Introduce helper function for getting PCI domain_nr On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:03:13PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 02:30:22AM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote: > > Add of_pci_get_domain_nr() to retrieve the PCI domain number > > of a given device from DT. If the information is not present, > > the function can be requested to allocate a new domain number. > > Is of_pci_get_domain_nr() used somewhere? If the use is in some future > series, please mention it explicitly. I'm just trying to avoid merging > unused code. It is used in the arm64 specific patch that I have dropped out of my pull request. After discussions with Catalin I will add the patch back into the tree that you've pulled from as he is OK with your tree carrying the whole package. I need to ask for some guidance here: for addressing some of your comments and Rob's I can add more patches in my v11 branch and you can pull them when you think they are ready. But one of your comments was requesting splitting a patch into two blocks - one that moves of_pci_range_to_resource() into drivers/of/address.c and one that fixes it's behaviour - and I don't know how you would like that handled. Should I revert the original patch and add the new ones, or should I rebase the whole series into a different branch that you can pull from? Best regards, Liviu > > Bjorn > -- ==================== | I would like to | | fix the world, | | but they're not | | giving me the | \ source code! / --------------- ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists