linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] phy: improved lookup method

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54200A13.6050201@ti.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:07:55 +0530
From:	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To:	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
CC:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
	Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@...sung.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] phy: improved lookup method

Hi,

On Thursday 18 September 2014 03:55 PM, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 03:35:08PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 08:16:01PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>> Assume you have 2 phys in your system..
>>> static struct phy_lookup usb_lookup = {
>>> 	.phy_name	= "phy-usb.0",
>>> 	.dev_id		= "usb.0",
>>> 	.con_id		= "usb",
>>> };
>>>
>>> static struct phy_lookup sata_lookup = {
>>> 	.phy_name	= "sata-usb.1",
>>> 	.dev_id		= "sata.0",
>>> 	.con_id		= "sata",
>>> };
>>>
>>> First you do modprobe phy-usb, the probe of USB PHY driver gets invoked and it
>>> creates the PHY. The phy-core will find a free id (now it will be 0) and then
>>> name the phy as phy-usb.0.
>>> Then with modprobe phy-sata, the phy-core will create phy-sata.1.
>>>
>>> This is an ideal case where the .phy_name in phy_lookup matches.
>>>
>>> Consider if the order is flipped and the user does modprobe phy-sata first. The
>>> phy_names won't match anymore (the sata phy device name would be "sata-usb.0").
> 
> Actually, I don't think there would be this problem if we used the
> name of the actual device which is the parent of phy devices, right?

hmm.. but if the parent is a multi-phy phy provider (like pipe3 PHY driver), we
might end up with the same problem.

Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/