[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54202EF8.4080909@de.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 16:15:20 +0200
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: tom.leiming@...il.com, axboe@...nel.dk
CC: David Hildenbrand <dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, mst@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ppinatti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: Avoid race condition with uninitialized requests
On 09/18/2014 11:04 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> This patch should fix the bug reported in https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/11/249.
>
> We have to initialize at least the atomic_flags and the cmd_flags when
> allocating storage for the requests.
>
> Otherwise blk_mq_timeout_check() might dereference uninitialized pointers when
> racing with the creation of a request.
>
> Also move the reset of cmd_flags for the initializing code to the point where a
> request is freed. So we will never end up with pending flush request indicators
> that might trigger dereferences of invalid pointers in blk_mq_timeout_check().
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Can you please add
Reported-by: Paulo De Rezende Pinatti <ppinatti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Paulo De Rezende Pinatti <ppinatti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
as Paulo did the testing work?
We thing this patch is fine and should go upstream.
Christian
> ---
> block/blk-mq.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 383ea0c..eed6340 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -203,7 +203,6 @@ __blk_mq_alloc_request(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data, int rw)
> if (tag != BLK_MQ_TAG_FAIL) {
> rq = data->hctx->tags->rqs[tag];
>
> - rq->cmd_flags = 0;
> if (blk_mq_tag_busy(data->hctx)) {
> rq->cmd_flags = REQ_MQ_INFLIGHT;
> atomic_inc(&data->hctx->nr_active);
> @@ -258,6 +257,7 @@ static void __blk_mq_free_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>
> if (rq->cmd_flags & REQ_MQ_INFLIGHT)
> atomic_dec(&hctx->nr_active);
> + rq->cmd_flags = 0;
>
> clear_bit(REQ_ATOM_STARTED, &rq->atomic_flags);
> blk_mq_put_tag(hctx, tag, &ctx->last_tag);
> @@ -1404,6 +1404,8 @@ static struct blk_mq_tags *blk_mq_init_rq_map(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
> left -= to_do * rq_size;
> for (j = 0; j < to_do; j++) {
> tags->rqs[i] = p;
> + tags->rqs[i]->atomic_flags = 0;
> + tags->rqs[i]->cmd_flags = 0;
> if (set->ops->init_request) {
> if (set->ops->init_request(set->driver_data,
> tags->rqs[i], hctx_idx, i,
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists