[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAErSpo7bnOFo4-uZmVsMqNpVQS+dQaMNedjmJ=sH_d9Kp2fGPg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:25:13 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@....com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Device Tree ML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 07/10] OF: Introduce helper function for getting PCI domain_nr
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:03:13PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 02:30:22AM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
>> > Add of_pci_get_domain_nr() to retrieve the PCI domain number
>> > of a given device from DT. If the information is not present,
>> > the function can be requested to allocate a new domain number.
>>
>> Is of_pci_get_domain_nr() used somewhere? If the use is in some future
>> series, please mention it explicitly. I'm just trying to avoid merging
>> unused code.
>
> It is used in the arm64 specific patch that I have dropped out of my
> pull request. After discussions with Catalin I will add the patch back
> into the tree that you've pulled from as he is OK with your tree carrying
> the whole package.
>
> I need to ask for some guidance here: for addressing some of your comments
> and Rob's I can add more patches in my v11 branch and you can pull them
> when you think they are ready. But one of your comments was requesting
> splitting a patch into two blocks - one that moves of_pci_range_to_resource()
> into drivers/of/address.c and one that fixes it's behaviour - and I don't
> know how you would like that handled. Should I revert the original patch
> and add the new ones, or should I rebase the whole series into a different
> branch that you can pull from?
I guess the easiest thing is probably just to send a v12 series. I
was hoping we were close enough for me to just hand-integrate minor
tweaks into my branch, but I think that will just create more
confusion.
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists