[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140922164404.GA28910@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 18:44:04 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] signal: simplify/document lock_task_sighand() logic
On 06/03, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> You know, this code could use some comments. I may send you a patch,
> because that __lock_task_sighand() is doing a lot of subtle things and
> there's not a single comment explaining it :-(
Sorry for delay.
Does 2/2 look clear enough?
Oleg.
kernel/fork.c | 5 ++++-
kernel/signal.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists