linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 0/3 v2] drivers/bus: Freescale Management Complex bus driver patch series

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0e13cde24a284873ab6f65f7e5ffdb3e@CY1PR0301MB0748.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:59:21 +0000
From:	Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@...escale.com>
To:	Kim Phillips <Kim.Phillips@...escale.com>,
	Jose Rivera <German.Rivera@...escale.com>
CC:	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>,
	"agraf@...e.de" <agraf@...e.de>,
	"linuxppc-release@...ux.freescale.net" 
	<linuxppc-release@...ux.freescale.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/3 v2] drivers/bus: Freescale Management Complex bus
 driver patch series



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kim Phillips [mailto:kim.phillips@...escale.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 11:53 AM
> To: Rivera Jose-B46482
> Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; arnd@...db.de; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Yoder Stuart-B08248; Wood Scott-
> B07421; agraf@...e.de; linuxppc-release@...ux.freescale.net
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] drivers/bus: Freescale Management Complex bus driver patch series
> 
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 17:49:38 -0500
> "J. German Rivera" <German.Rivera@...escale.com> wrote:
> 
> > CHANGE HISTORY
> >
> > Issues pending resolution not addressed by v2:
> > - What to do with Doxygen comments in patch 1
> 
> It's clear they should be removed.
> 
> > - Whether to move or not FSL-specific header files added in include/linux,
> >   by this patch series, to another location
> 
> there wasn't a valid objection against moving them under fsl/ and
> changing them to use dashes instead of underscores, was there?

There was no objection, but here is the observation.  The current
convention seems to be that under include/linux are 'subsystem'
types--
   include/linux/mmc
   include/linux/spi
   include/linux/raid
    etc

There is no other "company" that has an include/linux/[company-name] that I can
see.  Freescale seems to be the only one.   And there is only a single driver
in there.  So it looks like a complete anomaly.

Why is that?

I guess we could try moving our stuff to incluce/linux/fsl and see if there is
any negative feedback on it.

Stuart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/