[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140922180807.GN5182@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:08:07 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tomasz.figa@...il.com, rabin@....in,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 04/10] clk: use struct clk only for external API
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 04:15:47PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.h b/drivers/clk/clk.h
> index d278572..3b3068b 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.h
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.h
> @@ -9,9 +9,15 @@
> * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> */
>
> +#include <linux/clk-private.h>
> +
> #if defined(CONFIG_OF) && defined(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK)
> struct clk_core *of_clk_get_by_clkspec(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec);
> struct clk_core *__of_clk_get_from_provider(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec);
> void of_clk_lock(void);
> void of_clk_unlock(void);
> #endif
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK)
> +struct clk *__clk_create_clk(struct clk_core *clk_core);
> +#endif
Why does any of the above need ifdefs?
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clkdev.c b/drivers/clk/clkdev.c
> index c751d0c..060041b 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clkdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clkdev.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> #include <linux/string.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/clk-private.h>
> #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> #include <linux/clkdev.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> @@ -33,13 +34,13 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(clocks_mutex);
I'm not happy with any of these changes, because it introduces a huge
number of ifdefs.
Instead of doing this, please introduce a local typedef in this .c file
which is conditional on whether we're using your new struct clk_core
or not, eg, clkdev_ret_t.
Then, rename all the functions here to be _provider based, and arrange
for these to return clkdev_ret_t.
Then provide the original functions, with your __clk_create_clk() call
to allocate your struct clk. A dummy version which merely returns its
argument can be provided when we're not using clk_core.
This should result in substantially fewer ifdefs - probably just one
ifdef.
Another concern here is what happens when __clk_create_clk() fails.
Your __clk_create_clk() function does nothing in that regard, so any
references which the parent function took are never released.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists