linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 3/6] sched: Use dl_bw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140922183216.10761.27458.stgit@localhost>
Date:	Mon, 22 Sep 2014 22:32:16 +0400
From:	Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...dex.ru>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/6] sched: Use dl_bw_of() under RCU read lock

From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>

dl_bw_of() dereferences rq->rd which has to have RCU read lock held.
Probability of use-after-free isn't zero here.

Also add lockdep assert into dl_bw_cpus().

Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v3.14+
---
 kernel/sched/core.c |   10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 5b864e9..a300fce 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1989,6 +1989,8 @@ unsigned long to_ratio(u64 period, u64 runtime)
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 inline struct dl_bw *dl_bw_of(int i)
 {
+	rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_sched_held(),
+			   "sched RCU must be held");
 	return &cpu_rq(i)->rd->dl_bw;
 }
 
@@ -1997,6 +1999,8 @@ static inline int dl_bw_cpus(int i)
 	struct root_domain *rd = cpu_rq(i)->rd;
 	int cpus = 0;
 
+	rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_sched_held(),
+			   "sched RCU must be held");
 	for_each_cpu_and(i, rd->span, cpu_active_mask)
 		cpus++;
 
@@ -7623,6 +7627,8 @@ static int sched_dl_global_constraints(void)
 	int cpu, ret = 0;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
+	rcu_read_lock();
+
 	/*
 	 * Here we want to check the bandwidth not being set to some
 	 * value smaller than the currently allocated bandwidth in
@@ -7644,6 +7650,8 @@ static int sched_dl_global_constraints(void)
 			break;
 	}
 
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -7659,6 +7667,7 @@ static void sched_dl_do_global(void)
 	if (global_rt_runtime() != RUNTIME_INF)
 		new_bw = to_ratio(global_rt_period(), global_rt_runtime());
 
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	/*
 	 * FIXME: As above...
 	 */
@@ -7669,6 +7678,7 @@ static void sched_dl_do_global(void)
 		dl_b->bw = new_bw;
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
 	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
 static int sched_rt_global_validate(void)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/