[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <541F9C96.10705@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:50:46 +0800
From: Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, <keescook@...omium.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] sched: fix confusing PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS constant
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Commit 1d4457f99928 ("sched: move no_new_privs into new atomic flags")
defined PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS as hexadecimal value, but it is confusing
because it is used as bit number. Redefine it as decimal bit number.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 5c2c885..4557765 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1957,7 +1957,7 @@ static inline void memalloc_noio_restore(unsigned int flags)
}
/* Per-process atomic flags. */
-#define PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS 0x00000001 /* May not gain new privileges. */
+#define PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS 0 /* May not gain new privileges. */
static inline bool task_no_new_privs(struct task_struct *p)
{
--
1.8.0.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists