[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJhHMCCCWN+poNmNL0Q6B1RHJAETOsgMCAykm1GmiL18BtKfAg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 16:20:08 -0400
From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE..." <x86@...nel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE..." <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86: Use ACCESS_ONCE() for atomic_read()
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 03:53:09PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>> Use the much easier to read ACCESS_ONCE() which is basically the same thing as
>> the cast to volatile.
>>
>> Please note the change in volatile cast: ACCESS_ONCE(v)->counter to
>> ACCESS_ONCE(v->counter).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> If you want to do something like so, then be consistent and do them all.
Sure, I will change this in all architectures and send in an updated patch.
Thanks!
--
Pranith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists