[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACoXjc=od24kz4RbMLOZNGbMwsAjc8+Ko0rEXNc=2yKnN_3NkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:40:03 -0700
From: Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@....com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
patches <patches@....com>, Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/4] pci:host: APM X-Gene PCIe host controller driver
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@....com> wrote:
>
>>>> +static void xgene_pcie_fixup_bridge(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int i;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Hide the PCI host BARs from the kernel as their content doesn't
>>>> + * fit well in the resource management
>>>> + */
>>>
>>> This needs a better explanation than "doesn't fit well."
>>>
>>> I *think* you're probably talking about something similar to the MVEBU
>>> devices mentioned here:
>>> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAErSpo56jB1Bf2JtYCGKXZBZqRF1jXFxGmeewPX_e6vSXueGyA@mail.gmail.com
>>>
>>> where the device can be configured as either an endpoint or a root port,
>>> and the endpoint BARs are still visible when configured as a root port.
>>>
>>
>> It is true that X-Gene PCIe port can be configured as EP, however the
>> the FIXUP is required not because of the BARs are still visible when
>> configured as EP in past. X-Gene PCIe port, when configured as RC,
>> uses BAR0-BAR1 of RC's configuration space as inbound BARs. Entire DDR
>> region is mapped in these BARs so that it is accessible for EP devices
>> for DMA. So if the fixup is not done during enumeration, whole
>> outbound memory resource space gets assigned to RC and nothing is left
>> EP devices.
>
> I'm not familiar with the concept of an "inbound BAR"; at least I'm
> not aware of anything like this in the PCI specs. I think it might
> reduce confusion if we avoided calling them "BARs". They happen to be
> at the same addresses where real BARs would be, but they certainly
> don't behave like real BARs.
>
> It sounds like this is basically a trivial IOMMU that determines which
> DMA accesses can reach main memory.
>
Yes. That is correct.
>>> In any event, I'd like a description of exactly what these BARs are and wha
>>> the problem is.
>>
>> Is it ok to put above description in comment to explain the fixup?
>>
>>> Presumably the BARs exist and were sized by the PCI core
>>> in __pci_read_base(). That will generate some log messages and possibly
>>> some warnings, depending on how the host bridge windows are set up.
>
> Instead of doing this in a fixup, can you change the PCI config
> accessors so that when accessing these inbound DMA mapping registers,
> they drop writes and return zeros for reads? Then the PCI core won't
> think there are BARs there, and it won't mistakenly corrupt them when
> it tries to size them.
>
I suppose this can be done. I will fix this in next revision.
> Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists