[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1411510450.24563.44.camel@ul30vt.home>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:14:10 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Antonios Motakis <a.motakis@...tualopensystems.com>,
"kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"tech@...tualopensystems.com" <tech@...tualopensystems.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"christoffer.dall@...aro.org" <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
"kim.phillips@...escale.com" <kim.phillips@...escale.com>,
"eric.auger@...aro.org" <eric.auger@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>,
"Upinder Malhi (umalhi)" <umalhi@...co.com>,
"moderated list:ARM SMMU DRIVER"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 01/26] iommu/arm-smmu: change IOMMU_EXEC to
IOMMU_NOEXEC
On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 15:58 +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Antonios,
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 03:46:00PM +0100, Antonios Motakis wrote:
> > Exposing the XN flag of the SMMU driver as IOMMU_NOEXEC instead of
> > IOMMU_EXEC makes it enforceable, since for IOMMUs that don't support
> > the XN flag pages will always be executable.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Antonios Motakis <a.motakis@...tualopensystems.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 9 +++++----
> > include/linux/iommu.h | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
> > index 20f9a52..e1a644c 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/iommu.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
> > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
> > #define IOMMU_READ (1 << 0)
> > #define IOMMU_WRITE (1 << 1)
> > #define IOMMU_CACHE (1 << 2) /* DMA cache coherency */
> > -#define IOMMU_EXEC (1 << 3)
> > +#define IOMMU_NOEXEC (1 << 3)
>
> This hunk needs to be a separate patch merged by Joerg before I can take the
> arm-smmu part (which looks fine).
That separate hunk would be unbuildable since arm-smmu depends on the
IOMMU_EXEC define. Patch 2/ is also in iommu code and gates patch 3/ in
arm-smmu. The IOMMU-core changes are pretty trivial, so perhaps Joerg
would be willing to ACK 1&2 and let Will include the first 3 patches
through his tree.
These first 3 patches should have been sent on their own since they're
small an obvious so they don't get hung up on the reset of the series.
Thanks,
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists