[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5421FFE3.8060402@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 17:18:59 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
colin.king@...onical.com, dbueso@...e.de, serge.hallyn@...ntu.com,
thierry@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, luto@...capital.net,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] selftests/mount: change test to use ksft framework
On 09/23/2014 05:07 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com> writes:
>
>> On 09/23/2014 04:41 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Change mount test to use kselftest framework to report
>>>> test results.
>>>
>>> Nacked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>>>
>>> I am curious did you even run these tests? I can't possibly see how
>>> the tests would have passed with this change. At the very least you
>>> have taken this test from linear to exponential time complexity.
>>>
>>
>> Oops. I meant to drop this commit from the series. Sorry for the
>> noise.
>
> No problem. Except for the unnecessary semantic change the rest of the
> change looked fine. I just wanted to make certain you didn't break my
> test by accident.
>
Thanks for catching it. The results didn't look right and I meant
to delay this change for later after another round of testing.
I will fix it without the unnecessary change and send it out
separately.
thanks,
-- Shuah
--
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@....samsung.com | (970) 217-8978
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists