lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140923052800.GB38355@jaegeuk-mac02.mot-mobility.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Sep 2014 22:28:00 -0700
From:	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To:	Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 08/10] f2fs: remove redundant operation during
 roll-forward recovery

Hi Chao,

I fixed that. :)

Thanks,

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 05:22:27PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@...nel.org]
> > Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 6:14 AM
> > To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org;
> > linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> > Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> > Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 08/10] f2fs: remove redundant operation during roll-forward recovery
> > 
> > If same data is updated multiple times, we don't need to redo whole the
> > operations.
> > Let's just update the lastest one.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
> 
> And one comment as following.
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h     |  4 +++-
> >  fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++------------------------
> >  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > index 48d7d46..74dde99 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > @@ -137,7 +137,9 @@ struct discard_entry {
> >  struct fsync_inode_entry {
> >  	struct list_head list;	/* list head */
> >  	struct inode *inode;	/* vfs inode pointer */
> > -	block_t blkaddr;	/* block address locating the last inode */
> > +	block_t blkaddr;	/* block address locating the last fsync */
> > +	block_t last_dentry;	/* block address locating the last dentry */
> > +	block_t last_inode;	/* block address locating the last inode */
> >  };
> > 
> >  #define nats_in_cursum(sum)		(le16_to_cpu(sum->n_nats))
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> > index 6f7fbfa..95d9dc9 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> > @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static struct fsync_inode_entry *get_fsync_inode(struct list_head *head,
> >  	return NULL;
> >  }
> > 
> > -static int recover_dentry(struct page *ipage, struct inode *inode)
> > +static int recover_dentry(struct inode *inode, struct page *ipage)
> >  {
> >  	struct f2fs_inode *raw_inode = F2FS_INODE(ipage);
> >  	nid_t pino = le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_pino);
> > @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ out:
> >  	return err;
> >  }
> > 
> > -static void __recover_inode(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
> > +static void recover_inode(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
> >  {
> >  	struct f2fs_inode *raw = F2FS_INODE(page);
> > 
> > @@ -152,21 +152,9 @@ static void __recover_inode(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
> >  	inode->i_atime.tv_nsec = le32_to_cpu(raw->i_mtime_nsec);
> >  	inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec = le32_to_cpu(raw->i_ctime_nsec);
> >  	inode->i_mtime.tv_nsec = le32_to_cpu(raw->i_mtime_nsec);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static int recover_inode(struct inode *inode, struct page *node_page)
> > -{
> > -	if (!IS_INODE(node_page))
> > -		return 0;
> > -
> > -	__recover_inode(inode, node_page);
> > -
> > -	if (is_dent_dnode(node_page))
> > -		return recover_dentry(node_page, inode);
> > 
> >  	f2fs_msg(inode->i_sb, KERN_NOTICE, "recover_inode: ino = %x, name = %s",
> > -			ino_of_node(node_page), F2FS_INODE(node_page)->i_name);
> > -	return 0;
> > +			ino_of_node(page), F2FS_INODE(page)->i_name);
> >  }
> > 
> >  static int find_fsync_dnodes(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct list_head *head)
> > @@ -214,12 +202,11 @@ static int find_fsync_dnodes(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct list_head
> > *head)
> >  			}
> > 
> >  			/* add this fsync inode to the list */
> > -			entry = kmem_cache_alloc(fsync_entry_slab, GFP_NOFS);
> > +			entry = kmem_cache_alloc(fsync_entry_slab, GFP_F2FS_ZERO);
> >  			if (!entry) {
> >  				err = -ENOMEM;
> >  				break;
> >  			}
> > -
> >  			/*
> >  			 * CP | dnode(F) | inode(DF)
> >  			 * For this case, we should not give up now.
> > @@ -236,9 +223,11 @@ static int find_fsync_dnodes(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct list_head
> > *head)
> >  		}
> >  		entry->blkaddr = blkaddr;
> > 
> > -		err = recover_inode(entry->inode, page);
> > -		if (err && err != -ENOENT)
> > -			break;
> > +		if (IS_INODE(page)) {
> > +			entry->last_inode = blkaddr;
> > +			if (is_dent_dnode(page))
> > +				entry->last_dentry = blkaddr;
> > +		}
> >  next:
> >  		/* check next segment */
> >  		blkaddr = next_blkaddr_of_node(page);
> > @@ -455,11 +444,15 @@ static int recover_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >  		/*
> >  		 * inode(x) | CP | inode(x) | dnode(F)
> >  		 * In this case, we can lose the latest inode(x).
> > -		 * So, call __recover_inode for the inode update.
> > +		 * So, call recover_inode for the inode update.
> >  		 */
> > -		if (IS_INODE(page))
> > -			__recover_inode(entry->inode, page);
> > -
> > +		if (entry->last_inode == blkaddr)
> > +			recover_inode(entry->inode, page);
> > +		if (entry->last_dentry == blkaddr) {
> > +			err = recover_dentry(entry->inode, page);
> > +			if (err)
> 
> Need f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
> 
> > +				break;
> > +		}
> >  		err = do_recover_data(sbi, entry->inode, page, blkaddr);
> >  		if (err)
> >  			break;
> > --
> > 1.8.5.2 (Apple Git-48)
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Want excitement?
> > Manually upgrade your production database.
> > When you want reliability, choose Perforce
> > Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
> > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > Linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ