linux-kernel - Re: boot stall regression due to blk-mq: use percpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140923060141.GF11740@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Tue, 23 Sep 2014 02:01:41 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: boot stall regression due to blk-mq: use percpu_ref for mq usage
 count

On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 07:59:24AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> "[PATCHSET percpu/for-3.18] percpu_ref: implement switch_to_atomic/percpu()"
> 
> looks way to big for 3.17, and the regression was introduced in the 3.17
> merge window.  I'm not sure what was broken before, but it defintively
> survived a lot of testing.

Do we even care about fixing it for 3.17?  scsi-mq isn't enabled by
default even for 3.18.  The open-coded percpu ref thing was subtly
broken there.  It'd be difficult to trigger but I'm fairly sure it'd
crap out in the wild once in a blue moon.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/