[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <542128AB.5030905@rock-chips.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:00:43 +0800
From: Mark yao <mark.yao@...k-chips.com>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jianqun Xu <xjq@...k-chips.com>,
Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
jeff chen <cym@...k-chips.com>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, kfx@...k-chips.com,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>, wxt@...k-chips.com,
Tao Huang <huangtao@...k-chips.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
yxj@...k-chips.com, Eddie Cai <cf@...k-chips.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Stéphane Marchesin <marcheu@...omium.org>,
xxm@...k-chips.com, xw@...k-chips.com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, dianders@...omium.org,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/rockchip: Add basic drm driver
On 2014年09月23日 15:48, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 09:32:19AM +0800, Mark yao wrote:
>> On 2014年09月20日 08:03, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Mark yao <mark.yao@...k-chips.com> wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/rockchip_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/rockchip_drm.h
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..8f8e60e
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/rockchip_drm.h
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
>>>> +/*
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Copyright (c) Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co.Ltd
>>>> + * Authors:
>>>> + * Mark Yao <yzq@...k-chips.com>
>>>> + *
>>>> + * base on exynos_drm.h
>>>> + *
>>>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
>>>> + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
>>>> + * Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your
>>>> + * option) any later version.
>>>> + */
>>>> +
>>>> +#ifndef _UAPI_ROCKCHIP_DRM_H
>>>> +#define _UAPI_ROCKCHIP_DRM_H
>>>> +
>>>> +#include <drm/drm.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * User-desired buffer creation information structure.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * @size: user-desired memory allocation size.
>>>> + * @flags: user request for setting memory type or cache attributes.
>>>> + * @handle: returned a handle to created gem object.
>>>> + * - this handle will be set by gem module of kernel side.
>>>> + */
>>>> +struct drm_rockchip_gem_create {
>>>> + uint64_t size;
>>>> + uint32_t flags;
>>>> + uint32_t handle;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * A structure for getting buffer offset.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * @handle: a pointer to gem object created.
>>>> + * @pad: just padding to be 64-bit aligned.
>>>> + * @offset: relatived offset value of the memory region allocated.
>>>> + * - this value should be set by user.
>>>> + */
>>>> +struct drm_rockchip_gem_map_off {
>>>> + uint32_t handle;
>>>> + uint32_t pad;
>>>> + uint64_t offset;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * A structure for mapping buffer.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * @handle: a handle to gem object created.
>>>> + * @pad: just padding to be 64-bit aligned.
>>>> + * @size: memory size to be mapped.
>>>> + * @mapped: having user virtual address mmaped.
>>>> + * - this variable would be filled by rockchip gem module
>>>> + * of kernel side with user virtual address which is allocated
>>>> + * by do_mmap().
>>>> + */
>>>> +struct drm_rockchip_gem_mmap {
>>>> + uint32_t handle;
>>>> + uint32_t pad;
>>>> + uint64_t size;
>>>> + uint64_t mapped;
>>>> +};
>>> Could we do without the mmap ioctl? It has been a source of problems
>>> in other drivers, and the ioctl to get mmap offset, plus normal mmap()
>>> on drm device file should be sufficient
>>>
>>> BR,
>>> -R
>> OK, I will try to move the special mmap ioctl and use drm generic mmap
>> interface.
> Actually you probably should drop all this and just implement the dummy
> object support for now. Until you have proper hw accel there's no reason
> to expose a driver-private gem create/mmap interface at all.
>
> A pure kms driver really shouldn't have it's on uapi/foo_drm.h file.
> -Daniel
right, I will try to do it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists