[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbzvyN0ecP2JA6LhYkPYhe_vJTrLvx4WOW73SRyoMLPEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:46:20 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] pinctrl: imx: detect uninitialized pins
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch> wrote:
> The pinctrl driver initialized the register offsets for the pins
> with 0. On Vybrid an offset of 0 is a valid offset for the pinctrl
> mux register. So far, this was solved using the ZERO_OFFSET_VALID
> flag which allowed offsets of 0. However, this does not allow to
> verify whether a pins struct imx_pmx_func was initialized or not.
>
> Use signed offset values for register offsets and initialize those
> with -1 in order to detect uninitialized offset values reliable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
Patch applied.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists