lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:58:15 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, eranian@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf, x86: Use INTEL_FLAGS_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT for PRECDIST On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:22:32PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:02:58AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 09:59:26AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 05:49:08PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> > > > > > > > > The earlier commit 86a04461a made near all PEBS on > > > > Sandy/IvyBridge/Haswell to reject non zero flags. > > > > > > What's magic about nehalem and westmere? > > > > I wasn't able to confirm their behavior explicitly, so I felt > > it best to leave them alone. > > > > But in principle adding the _FLAGS changes there too would > > make sense too. > > Yeah please do that patch ASAP, having PEBS behave differently across > uarchs is wrong. Ping! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists