lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140923130506.3433c5a3@bbrezillon>
Date:	Tue, 23 Sep 2014 13:05:06 +0200
From:	Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Johan Hovold <jhovold@...il.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 08/10] rtc: at91sam9: use clk API instead of relying
 on AT91_SLOW_CLOCK

On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 12:33:26 +0200
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:38:48AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> 
> > @@ -328,6 +328,7 @@ static int at91_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	struct sam9_rtc	*rtc;
> >  	int		ret, irq;
> >  	u32		mr;
> > +	unsigned int	sclk_rate;
> >  
> >  	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> >  	if (irq < 0) {
> > @@ -385,11 +386,27 @@ static int at91_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	rtc->sclk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(rtc->sclk))
> > +		return PTR_ERR(rtc->sclk);
> > +
> > +	sclk_rate = clk_get_rate(rtc->sclk);
> > +	if (!sclk_rate || sclk_rate > AT91_RTT_RTTRST) {
> 
> You probably meant AT91_RTT_RTPRES here.

Yes, that's what I meant.
Nice catch!

Thanks,

Boris


-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ