[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140923120959.GB1732@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:09:59 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: CAI Qian <caiqian@...hat.com>
Cc: ltp-list <ltp-list@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
kexec <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
crash-utility <crash-utility@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] autokdump - automated kdump testsuite
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:53:55PM -0400, CAI Qian wrote:
[..]
> > Why not simply let the respective service on the host do this job and
> > test only makes sure that kdump service is running. It feels little
> > out of place that a test is generating custom initramfs.
> Because not every distro will have a kdump service like Fedora.
So which distro does not have a service? Do we know this or we are
assuming that distributions don't have a service to load/unload
kdump kernel.
[..]
> > makedumpfile will reduce the vmcore file size to few hundreds of mega
> > bytes on most of the systems. Especially, this is just a test, so
> > system will be lightly loaded and vmcore will be small after filtering.
> It probably actually have test cases to heavily loaded the memory before
> dumping.
Your original proposal does not take care of this case either. A test
case could be heavily used memory and if user does not have sufficient
memory to save core, so be it. That test will fail.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists