linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] signal: simplify deadlock-avoidance in lock_task

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140923142037.GG3312@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:20:37 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] signal: simplify deadlock-avoidance in
 lock_task_sighand()

On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 07:45:22AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:

> > I really thing the preempt_disable/enable is not needed.
> > 
> > Paul, Thomas, care to comment?
> 
> I suspect you are right.  On normal kernels, rcu_read_lock() will
> ensure preemption is disabled.
> 
> On -rt, the locks within are all sleepable mutexes.
> 
> Either way, things should be ok.

But with CONFIG_PREEMPT we get preemptible RCU but not the
spinlock->rt_mutex conversion.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/