[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140923144936.GA9844@thin>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 07:49:36 -0700
From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"Rustad, Mark D" <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>,
"sparse@...isli.org" <sparse@...isli.org>,
"linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Silence even more W=2 warnings
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:01:20AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/io_apic.h: In function ‘io_apic_modify’:
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/io_apic.h:223:48: warning: declaration of ‘apic’ shadows a global declaration [-Wshadow]
> static inline void io_apic_modify(unsigned int apic, unsigned int reg, unsigned int value)
> ^
> In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h:12:0,
> from include/linux/smp.h:59,
> from include/linux/topology.h:33,
> from include/linux/gfp.h:8,
> from include/linux/kmod.h:22,
> from include/linux/module.h:13,
> from drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h:65,
> from drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c:1:
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h:366:21: warning: shadowed declaration is here [-Wshadow]
> extern struct apic *apic;
> ^
>
> So gcc complains that an unsigned int shadows a struct apic pointer.
Here, I think the right fix involves picking a more descriptive name
than "apic" for the global varible.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists