linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] drivers/bus: Freescale Management Complex bus driver patch series

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54218931.5070808@freescale.com>
Date:	Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:52:33 -0500
From:	German Rivera <German.Rivera@...escale.com>
To:	Yoder Stuart-B08248 <stuart.yoder@...escale.com>,
	Phillips Kim-R1AAHA <Kim.Phillips@...escale.com>
CC:	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Wood Scott-B07421 <scottwood@...escale.com>,
	"agraf@...e.de" <agraf@...e.de>,
	"linuxppc-release@...ux.freescale.net" 
	<linuxppc-release@...ux.freescale.net>,
	Erez Nir-RM30794 <nir.erez@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] drivers/bus: Freescale Management Complex bus
 driver patch series



On 09/22/2014 12:59 PM, Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kim Phillips [mailto:kim.phillips@...escale.com]
>> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 11:53 AM
>> To: Rivera Jose-B46482
>> Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; arnd@...db.de; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Yoder Stuart-B08248; Wood Scott-
>> B07421; agraf@...e.de; linuxppc-release@...ux.freescale.net
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] drivers/bus: Freescale Management Complex bus driver patch series
>>
>> On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 17:49:38 -0500
>> "J. German Rivera" <German.Rivera@...escale.com> wrote:
>>
>>> CHANGE HISTORY
>>>
>>> Issues pending resolution not addressed by v2:
>>> - What to do with Doxygen comments in patch 1
>>
>> It's clear they should be removed.
>>
>>> - Whether to move or not FSL-specific header files added in include/linux,
>>>    by this patch series, to another location
>>
>> there wasn't a valid objection against moving them under fsl/ and
>> changing them to use dashes instead of underscores, was there?
>
> There was no objection, but here is the observation.  The current
> convention seems to be that under include/linux are 'subsystem'
> types--
>     include/linux/mmc
>     include/linux/spi
>     include/linux/raid
>      etc
>
> There is no other "company" that has an include/linux/[company-name] that I can
> see.  Freescale seems to be the only one.   And there is only a single driver
> in there.  So it looks like a complete anomaly.
>
> Why is that?
>
> I guess we could try moving our stuff to incluce/linux/fsl and see if there is
> any negative feedback on it.
>

Ok, unless there is any objection, we will do the following file renamings:

Patch 1/3
drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl_dpmng_cmd.h -> drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dpmng-cmd.h
drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl_dprc_cmd.h -> drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc-cmd.h
drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl_mc_sys.c -> drivers/bus/fsl-mc/mc-sys.c
include/linux/fsl_dpmng.h -> include/linux/fsl/dpmng.h
include/linux/fsl_dprc.h -> include/linux/fsl/dprc.h
include/linux/fsl_mc_cmd.h -> include/linux/fsl/mc-cmd.h
include/linux/fsl_mc_sys.h -> include/linux/fsl/mc-sys.h

Patch 2/3
drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl_mc_bus.c -> drivers/bus/fsl-mc/mc-bus.c
include/linux/fsl_mc.h -> include/linux/fsl/mc.h
include/linux/fsl_mc_private.h -> include/linux/fsl/mc-private.h

Patch 3/3
drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl_mc_dprc.c -> drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc-driver.c
(there is a file already named drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc.c)

> Stuart
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/