| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:08:49 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: sre@...nel.org, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] power: gpio-charger: add device tree support
Heiko,
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:
> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...com>
>
> Add the ability to parse gpio-charger data from a devicetree node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...com>
> ---
> drivers/power/gpio-charger.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/power/gpio-charger.c b/drivers/power/gpio-charger.c
> index a0024b2..22f084a 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/gpio-charger.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/gpio-charger.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/power_supply.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
>
> #include <linux/power/gpio-charger.h>
>
> @@ -69,6 +71,59 @@ static enum power_supply_property gpio_charger_properties[] = {
> POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_ONLINE,
> };
>
> +static
> +struct gpio_charger_platform_data *gpio_charger_parse_dt(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> + struct gpio_charger_platform_data *pdata;
> + const char *chargetype;
> + enum of_gpio_flags flags;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!np)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> +
> + pdata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pdata)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + pdata->name = np->name;
> +
> + pdata->gpio = of_get_gpio_flags(np, 0, &flags);
> + if (pdata->gpio < 0) {
> + if (pdata->gpio != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + dev_err(dev, "could not get charger gpio\n");
> + return ERR_PTR(pdata->gpio);
> + }
> +
> + pdata->gpio_active_low = !!(flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW);
> +
> + pdata->type = POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_UNKNOWN;
> + ret = of_property_read_string(np, "charger-type", &chargetype);
> + if (ret >= 0) {
> + if (!strncmp("unknown", chargetype, 7))
> + pdata->type = POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_UNKNOWN;
> + else if (!strncmp("battery", chargetype, 7))
> + pdata->type = POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_BATTERY;
> + else if (!strncmp("ups", chargetype, 3))
> + pdata->type = POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_UPS;
> + else if (!strncmp("mains", chargetype, 5))
> + pdata->type = POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_MAINS;
> + else if (!strncmp("usb-sdp", chargetype, 7))
> + pdata->type = POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_USB;
> + else if (!strncmp("usb-dcp", chargetype, 7))
> + pdata->type = POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_USB_DCP;
> + else if (!strncmp("usb-cdp", chargetype, 7))
> + pdata->type = POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_USB_CDP;
> + else if (!strncmp("usb-aca", chargetype, 7))
> + pdata->type = POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_USB_ACA;
> + else
> + dev_warn(dev, "unknown charger type %s\n", chargetype);
> + }
> +
> + return pdata;
> +}
> +
> static int gpio_charger_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> const struct gpio_charger_platform_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> @@ -78,8 +133,13 @@ static int gpio_charger_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> int irq;
>
> if (!pdata) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No platform data\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> + pdata = gpio_charger_parse_dt(&pdev->dev);
> + if (IS_ERR(pdata)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(pdata);
> + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No platform data\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> }
>
> if (!gpio_is_valid(pdata->gpio)) {
> @@ -103,6 +163,7 @@ static int gpio_charger_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> charger->get_property = gpio_charger_get_property;
> charger->supplied_to = pdata->supplied_to;
> charger->num_supplicants = pdata->num_supplicants;
> + charger->of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
>
> ret = gpio_request(pdata->gpio, dev_name(&pdev->dev));
> if (ret) {
> @@ -189,6 +250,12 @@ static int gpio_charger_resume(struct device *dev)
> static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(gpio_charger_pm_ops,
> gpio_charger_suspend, gpio_charger_resume);
>
> +static const struct of_device_id gpio_charger_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "gpio-charger" },
> + { }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, gpio_charger_match);
> +
> static struct platform_driver gpio_charger_driver = {
> .probe = gpio_charger_probe,
> .remove = gpio_charger_remove,
> @@ -196,6 +263,7 @@ static struct platform_driver gpio_charger_driver = {
> .name = "gpio-charger",
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .pm = &gpio_charger_pm_ops,
> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(gpio_charger_match),
I'm still not convinced about of_match_ptr() here as you can see in my
response to v2. ...but at most it could give a warning that would be
something like "gpio_charger_match defined but not used" in the
!CONFIG_OF case, so I guess it's fine?
In any case, everything else looks reasonable:
Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Tested-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists