[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1409230232080.3995@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 02:44:51 +0000 (UTC)
From: Scot Doyle <lkml14@...tdoyle.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
cc: Michael Mullin <masmullin@...il.com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Ashley Lai <ashley@...leylai.com>,
Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@...horst.net>,
Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@...gle.com>,
tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v8] tpm_tis: verify interrupt during init
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:50:00AM +0000, Scot Doyle wrote:
>> + if (!priv->irq_tested) {
>
> I think the sleep and check is still needed here, the IRQ delivery
> could race relative to the MMIO read of completion, a sleep is the
> only way we could attempt to synchronize them..
>
>> + disable_interrupts(chip);
>> + dev_err(chip->dev,
>> + FW_BUG "TPM interrupt not working, polling instead\n");
>> + }
>> + priv->irq_tested = true;
>> + return rc;
>> +}
We re-tested this v9 patch. It has the msleep(1) added just above this
section for better formatting, as well as a devm_kzalloc check in
tpm_tis_init. Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists