[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140923180255.GA3430@griffinp-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon-2nd>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 19:02:55 +0100
From: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>, kernel@...inux.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 1/3] media: st-rc: move to using
reset_control_get_optional
Hi Srini,
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> This patch fixes a compilation error while building with the
> random kernel configuration.
>
> drivers/media/rc/st_rc.c: In function 'st_rc_probe':
> drivers/media/rc/st_rc.c:281:2: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'reset_control_get' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> rc_dev->rstc = reset_control_get(dev, NULL);
>
> drivers/media/rc/st_rc.c:281:15: warning: assignment makes pointer
> from integer without a cast [enabled by default]
> rc_dev->rstc = reset_control_get(dev, NULL);
Is managing the reset line actually optional though? I can't test atm as I don't have
access to my board, but quite often if the IP's aren't taken out of reset reads / writes
to the perhpiheral will hang the SoC.
If managing the reset line isn't optional then I think the correct fix is to add
depends on RESET_CONTROLLER in the kconfig.
This will then do the right thing for randconfig builds as well.
regards,
Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists