[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1411584074.3594.17.camel@joe-AO725>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:41:14 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, tapaswenipathak@...il.com,
opw-kernel@...glegroups.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Subject: checkpatch: Does anyone care that comments are freeform aligned?
On Wed, 2014-09-24 at 07:47 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> In the following patch extract, one line is indented with spaces rather
> than tabs. Is it intentional that checkpatch doesn't complain about this,
> I guess due to the line being a comment?
[]
> struct bcm_hdr_suppression_contextinfo {
> - UCHAR ucaHdrSuppressionInBuf[MAX_PHS_LENGTHS]; /* Intermediate buffer to accumulate pkt Header for PHS */
> - UCHAR ucaHdrSuppressionOutBuf[MAX_PHS_LENGTHS + PHSI_LEN]; /* Intermediate buffer containing pkt Header after PHS */
> + /* Intermediate buffer to accumulate pkt Header for PHS */
> + UCHAR ucaHdrSuppressionInBuf[MAX_PHS_LENGTHS];
> + /* Intermediate buffer containing pkt Header after PHS */
> + UCHAR ucaHdrSuppressionOutBuf[MAX_PHS_LENGTHS + PHSI_LEN];
> };
checkpatch does not care when comments start in any
particular position or ensure comments have tabs
preceding them.
Does anyone care?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists