[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1411585151.19525.29.camel@x220>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 20:59:11 +0200
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: efm32: drop selecting NO_DMA
The Kconfig entry for ARCH_EFM32 selects NO_DMA. But that doesn't have
any effect as arm doesn't have a Kconfig entry for NO_DMA. This select
is a nop. Drop it.
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
---
Tested by playing with arch/arm/configs/efm32_defconfig. After "make
oldconfig" the .config contains CONFIG_HAS_DMA=y both before and after
this patch, as is expected.
Actually, the only difference I found in the .config file was that after
this patch the .config file contained
CONFIG_ARCH_EFM32=y
I have no idea why. Did I botch my test?
arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index d63e50615e9c..804ddc134c3c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -426,7 +426,6 @@ config ARCH_EFM32
select COMMON_CLK
select CPU_V7M
select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
- select NO_DMA
select NO_IOPORT_MAP
select SPARSE_IRQ
select USE_OF
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists