linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: qcom: Update SoC compatibles we support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <42858D66-62FA-4F89-A1A2-584DD6A7BE34@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Wed, 24 Sep 2014 14:26:10 -0500
From:	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: qcom: Update SoC compatibles we support


On Sep 24, 2014, at 1:34 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> wrote:

> On 09/24/14 11:20, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Move to just using the SoC name in the compatible list so we don't need
>> to update this for every board going forward.  Also added "qcom,msm8974"
>> to the list as we support "qcom,apq8074" already (the modemless version
>> of "qcom,msm8974").
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
> 
> Or just remove the file entirely. Things work without having to add
> anything here anyway.

I’d prefer there to be some filter, but maybe you are right.  I doubt we’ll add too many other platforms to this going forward.

- k

-- 
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/