[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140924202739.GP18635@console-pimps.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 21:27:39 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] perf/x86/intel: Add Intel Cache QoS Monitoring
support
On Wed, 24 Sep, at 09:40:10AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org> writes:
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> > index 7e1fd4e08552..8abb18fbcd13 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> > @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL) += perf_event_p6.o perf_event_knc.o perf_event_p4.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL) += perf_event_intel_lbr.o perf_event_intel_ds.o perf_event_intel.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL) += perf_event_intel_uncore.o perf_event_intel_uncore_snb.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL) += perf_event_intel_uncore_snbep.o perf_event_intel_uncore_nhmex.o
> > -obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL) += perf_event_intel_rapl.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL) += perf_event_intel_rapl.o perf_event_intel_cqm.o
>
> What's missing to be able to make this a module?
Not sure, that's not something I'd thought of. I simply copied every
other PMU driver in this directory.
But as an experiment I tried it, and the only thing that appears to be
necessary is adding EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() to events_sysfs_show.
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Is @cpu a designated cqm reader?
> > + */
> > + if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &cqm_cpumask))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + for_each_online_cpu(i) {
>
> Likely possible cpus to avoid races? Otherwise you'll need more locking.
I was under the impression that CPU_DOWN_PREPARE notifiers were
serialized against cpu hotplug. And reading the code, that does appear
to be so.
What race have you got in mind?
> > +static int __init intel_cqm_init(void)
> > +{
> > + int i, cpu, ret;
> > +
> > + if (!cpu_has(&boot_cpu_data, X86_FEATURE_CQM_OCCUP_LLC))
> > + return -ENODEV;
>
> This should use cpufeature.h
What? Please be more explicit.
> > +
> > + cqm_l3_scale = boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_occ_scale;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * It's possible that not all resources support the same number
> > + * of RMIDs. Instead of making scheduling much more complicated
> > + * (where we have to match a task's RMID to a cpu that supports
> > + * that many RMIDs) just find the minimum RMIDs supported across
> > + * all cpus.
> > + *
> > + * Also, check that the scales match on all cpus.
> > + */
> > + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
>
> And this should take the cpu hotplug lock (although it may be
> latent at this point if it's only running at early initializion)
Good catch, this is racy. I'll fix this up.
> But in fact what good is the test then if you only
> every likely check cpu #0?
We don't, we check every online cpu, not just cpu 0.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists