linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: softdirty: keep bit when zapping file pte

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 24 Sep 2014 14:59:27 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Peter Feiner <pfeiner@...gle.com>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
	Jamie Liu <jamieliu@...gle.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: softdirty: keep bit when zapping file pte

On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 01:03:07 -0700 Peter Feiner <pfeiner@...gle.com> wrote:

> Fixes the same bug as b43790eedd31e9535b89bbfa45793919e9504c34 and
> 9aed8614af5a05cdaa32a0b78b0f1a424754a958 where the return value of
> pte_*mksoft_dirty was being ignored.
> 
> To be sure that no other pte/pmd "mk" function return values were
> being ignored, I annotated the functions in
> arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h with __must_check and rebuilt.
> 

Grumble.

It is useful to identify preceding similar patches but that isn't a
good way of describing *this* patch.  What is wrong with the current
code, how does the patch fix it.

And, particularly, what do you think are the end-user visible effects
of the bug?  This info helps people to work out which kernel versions
need the fix.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/