[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140924093648.GA5811@mwanda>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 12:36:48 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@...il.com>
Cc: lidza.louina@...il.com, markh@...pro.net,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] staging: dgap: adds missing iounmap for re_map_port
in dgap_release_remap()
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 09:22:08AM +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/dgap/dgap.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgap/dgap.c b/drivers/staging/dgap/dgap.c
> index 779d144..637ea8a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/dgap/dgap.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/dgap/dgap.c
> @@ -1026,6 +1026,7 @@ static void dgap_release_remap(struct board_t *brd)
> release_mem_region(brd->membase, 0x200000);
> release_mem_region(brd->membase + PCI_IO_OFFSET, 0x200000);
> iounmap(brd->re_map_membase);
> + iounmap(brd->re_map_port);
I don't think it matters, but at least aesthetically it would be better
to unmap first and then release the regions. (You can do this in a
different patch).
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists