linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 06/10] block: remove blk_init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACVXFVMv-mb8LJuJHMJA-3LWYHhV3Cki6fc+_OK3kzXXB2WXnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 24 Sep 2014 22:49:00 +0800
From:	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/10] block: remove blk_init_flush() and its pair

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 09:11:10PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> Now mission of the two helpers is over, and just call
>> blk_alloc_flush_queue() and blk_free_flush_queue() directly.
>
> I suspect it might be much easier to fold all previous patches except
> for patch 4, which stands alone into one.  There's just too much churn
> there which doesn't stay in the final version.

Simpler to merge, but more difficult to split. It is for easier review,
since patch 5 is a bit big and each patch still does one thing.

Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/