[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-66339c31bc3978d5fff9c4b4cb590a861def4db2@git.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 07:57:05 -0700
From: tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ktkhai@...allels.com, hpa@...or.com,
mingo@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
peterz@...radead.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched: Use dl_bw_of() under RCU read lock
Commit-ID: 66339c31bc3978d5fff9c4b4cb590a861def4db2
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/66339c31bc3978d5fff9c4b4cb590a861def4db2
Author: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 22:36:24 +0400
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 14:47:09 +0200
sched: Use dl_bw_of() under RCU read lock
dl_bw_of() dereferences rq->rd which has to have RCU read lock held.
Probability of use-after-free isn't zero here.
Also add lockdep assert into dl_bw_cpus().
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v3.14+
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140922183624.11015.71558.stgit@localhost
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 5b0eac9..f0adb03 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2021,6 +2021,8 @@ unsigned long to_ratio(u64 period, u64 runtime)
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
inline struct dl_bw *dl_bw_of(int i)
{
+ rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_sched_held(),
+ "sched RCU must be held");
return &cpu_rq(i)->rd->dl_bw;
}
@@ -2029,6 +2031,8 @@ static inline int dl_bw_cpus(int i)
struct root_domain *rd = cpu_rq(i)->rd;
int cpus = 0;
+ rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_sched_held(),
+ "sched RCU must be held");
for_each_cpu_and(i, rd->span, cpu_active_mask)
cpus++;
@@ -7645,6 +7649,8 @@ static int sched_dl_global_constraints(void)
int cpu, ret = 0;
unsigned long flags;
+ rcu_read_lock();
+
/*
* Here we want to check the bandwidth not being set to some
* value smaller than the currently allocated bandwidth in
@@ -7666,6 +7672,8 @@ static int sched_dl_global_constraints(void)
break;
}
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
return ret;
}
@@ -7681,6 +7689,7 @@ static void sched_dl_do_global(void)
if (global_rt_runtime() != RUNTIME_INF)
new_bw = to_ratio(global_rt_period(), global_rt_runtime());
+ rcu_read_lock();
/*
* FIXME: As above...
*/
@@ -7691,6 +7700,7 @@ static void sched_dl_do_global(void)
dl_b->bw = new_bw;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
}
+ rcu_read_unlock();
}
static int sched_rt_global_validate(void)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists