[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-5bd96ab6fef66ec6b9f54134364e618fd0f8f2f3@git.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 07:56:22 -0700
From: tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org,
umgwanakikbuti@...il.com, tkhai@...dex.ru, tglx@...utronix.de,
oleg@...hat.com
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched: print_rq(): Don't use tasklist_lock
Commit-ID: 5bd96ab6fef66ec6b9f54134364e618fd0f8f2f3
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/5bd96ab6fef66ec6b9f54134364e618fd0f8f2f3
Author: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
AuthorDate: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 21:33:41 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 14:47:04 +0200
sched: print_rq(): Don't use tasklist_lock
read_lock_irqsave(tasklist_lock) in print_rq() looks strange. We do
not need to disable irqs, and they are already disabled by the caller.
And afaics this lock buys nothing, we can rely on rcu_read_lock().
In this case it makes sense to also move rcu_read_lock/unlock from
the caller to print_rq().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...dex.ru>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140921193341.GA28628@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/sched/debug.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
index c7fe1ea0..ce33780 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
@@ -150,7 +150,6 @@ print_task(struct seq_file *m, struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
static void print_rq(struct seq_file *m, struct rq *rq, int rq_cpu)
{
struct task_struct *g, *p;
- unsigned long flags;
SEQ_printf(m,
"\nrunnable tasks:\n"
@@ -159,14 +158,14 @@ static void print_rq(struct seq_file *m, struct rq *rq, int rq_cpu)
"------------------------------------------------------"
"----------------------------------------------------\n");
- read_lock_irqsave(&tasklist_lock, flags);
+ rcu_read_lock();
for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
if (task_cpu(p) != rq_cpu)
continue;
print_task(m, rq, p);
}
- read_unlock_irqrestore(&tasklist_lock, flags);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
}
void print_cfs_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
@@ -331,9 +330,7 @@ do { \
print_cfs_stats(m, cpu);
print_rt_stats(m, cpu);
- rcu_read_lock();
print_rq(m, rq, cpu);
- rcu_read_unlock();
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched_debug_lock, flags);
SEQ_printf(m, "\n");
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists