[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d2al7hb5.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 21:50:38 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: John Blackwood <john.blackwood@...r.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ PATCH ] Remove numa_balancing sysctl dependence on CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
John Blackwood <john.blackwood@...r.com> writes:
> numa: numa_balancing sysctl scope change
>
> Make the 'numa_balancing' sysctl parameter no longer dependent upon
> CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG so it can be used in non-debug kernels.
Looks good.
-Andi
>
> Signed-off-by: John Blackwood <john.blackwood@...r.com>
>
> Index: b/kernel/sysctl.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
> @@ -389,6 +389,9 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = {
> .mode = 0644,
> .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
> },
> +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> {
> .procname = "numa_balancing",
> .data = NULL, /* filled in by handler */
> @@ -399,7 +402,6 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = {
> .extra2 = &one,
> },
> #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
> -#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG */
> {
> .procname = "sched_rt_period_us",
> .data = &sysctl_sched_rt_period,
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists