linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 1/3] mfd: devicetree: bindings: Add Qualcomm RPM DT binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 24 Sep 2014 17:21:12 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
Cc:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/3] mfd: devicetree: bindings: Add Qualcomm RPM DT
 binding

On Wed, 24 Sep 2014, Bjorn Andersson wrote:

> On Wed 24 Sep 01:22 PDT 2014, Lee Jones wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 22 Sep 2014, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > 
> > > Add binding for the Qualcomm Resource Power Manager (RPM) found in 8660,
> > > 8960 and 8064 based devices. The binding currently describes the rpm
> > > itself and the regulator subnodes.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom-rpm.txt |  246 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > 
> > Please adhere to: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt
> > 
> 
> I assume you mean this part:
> 
>   1) The Documentation/ portion of the patch should be a separate patch.
> 
> But I doubt this document was written with include/dt-bindings in mind, because
> in my eyes they are part of "device tree bindings".

Actually, this is an oversight on my part.  If I would have seen that
this patch only touched the bindings and include/dt-bindings I
probably wouldn't have said anything.

This patch still needs a DT Ack though.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/