linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] ftracetest: Add a couple of ftrace test cases

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 24 Sep 2014 12:30:07 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Cc:	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>,
	Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ftracetest: Add a couple of ftrace test cases

On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 10:22:12 -0600
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com> wrote:


> One simple approach is to have the user install the required tools
> for the test. Indicate what is needed and fail the test with
> appropriate message with xskip. This is what I have in mind for
> tests that can't be run because of a missing config. The same can
> be extended to external tools that the test depends on.

Should I hold off adding my tests until we have all this in place. Or
should I just push my tests with simply passing if the config isn't
supported for now and add it later?

I wont add any of the tests that require other tools besides echo, grep
and cat.

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/