[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46921955713f4b155eef9b21e5138064@agner.ch>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:51:16 +0200
From: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
To: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
Cc: shawn.guo@...escale.com, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, gnurou@...il.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
jingchang.lu@...escale.com, b20788@...escale.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] gpio: vf610: Extend with wakeup support
Am 2014-09-24 12:06, schrieb Lucas Stach:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> Am Montag, den 22.09.2014, 19:09 +0200 schrieb Stefan Agner:
>> Support Vybrid GPIO's as wakeup source by requesting the parent
>> IRQ as wakeup IRQ.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c
>> index 5f59424..50326af 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c
>> @@ -196,12 +196,28 @@ static void vf610_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
>> pcr_base);
>> }
>>
>> +static int vf610_gpio_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, u32 enable)
>> +{
>> + struct vf610_gpio_port *port = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>> +
>> + if (enable)
>> + enable_irq_wake(port->irq);
>> + else
>> + disable_irq_wake(port->irq);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>> static struct irq_chip vf610_gpio_irq_chip = {
>> .name = "gpio-vf610",
>> .irq_ack = vf610_gpio_irq_ack,
>> .irq_mask = vf610_gpio_irq_mask,
>> .irq_unmask = vf610_gpio_irq_unmask,
>> .irq_set_type = vf610_gpio_irq_set_type,
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>> + .irq_set_wake = vf610_gpio_irq_set_wake,
>> +#endif
>
> Either you need to get rid of this #ifdef and always assign this
> function or you need to wrap the function itself into the same #ifdef.
> Otherwise you provoke a unused function warning with !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP.
>
> Given that this function isn't really that big I would argue to just
> drop the #ifdef.
>
Good point, thx! I will drop the #ifdef when including that patch to the
GPIO driver (as Linus Walleij suggested).
--
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists