linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kernel: acctc.c: Fixed else if not generally userful after a break or return warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140925050004.GM7996@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 25 Sep 2014 06:00:04 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Elshad Mustafayev <elshadimo@...il.com>
Cc:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: acctc.c: Fixed else if not generally userful
 after a break or return warning

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:34:11AM -0400, Elshad Mustafayev wrote:
> I am sorry if I disturbed you. I just follow the steps in kernel newbies to
> get me in kernel development.

It's not you, it's checkpatch.pl plus the fairly common tendency to give
that thing a lot more respect than it deserves...

Basically, it's OK as a tool that draws ones attention to a subset of
code that might or might not be worth looking at; it gives both false
positives and false negatives and as long as there's not too much of those,
it's useful.  Provided that it does *not* replace one's taste.  I.e. "hey,
it points to these lines; let's take a look, some of those might be
worth some attention", rather than "The Most Holy Oracle Has Spoken;
Do What It Says".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/