linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: dts: add CPU nodes for Exynos4 SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5423D8F3.104@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Sep 2014 10:57:23 +0200
From:	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
To:	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
CC:	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
	"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
	<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	'Thomas Abraham' <ta.omasab@...il.com>,
	'Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz' <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	'Marek Szyprowski' <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: dts: add CPU nodes for Exynos4 SoCs



On 25.09.2014 10:44, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> On 09/25/14 17:28, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> Hi Kukjin,
>>
>> On 25.09.2014 10:26, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>>> On 09/25/14 17:17, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>>> [CC'ed Daniel to make him aware this patch goes through your tree]
>>>>
>>> Thanks and just note the branch  which is including this change actually
>>> v4 is just rebased not v3 will be sent out to arm-soc last tonight or
>>> tomorrow.
> 
> v3 is correct :) sorry, I confused the version...
> 
>>
>> Could you keep this patch in a separate stable branch, so I could pull
>> it as a dependency for Thomas Abraham's cpufreq series?
>>
> It's possible, but would be better that DT changes are sent to upstream
> through samsung/arm-soc tree?...we suffered ugly conflicts between
> arm-soc and driver before and then we decided DT changes should be
> handled in arm-soc...Hmm...

The only other option I can see is splitting the series and sending
mach/dts patches through arm-soc and clock/cpufreq patches through clock
tree. This would break cpufreq support in both trees, until they both
hit Linus's tree. If this is not a problem, then I can proceed this way.

Please correct me if I'm missing something.

Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/